Discover the dual mechanism behind one of oncology's most important drugs and its newly discovered role in targeting cancer metabolism.
In what can only be described as a scientific serendipity, Michigan State University researcher Barnett Rosenberg made an unexpected discovery in 1965 that would forever change cancer treatment. While studying how electricity affects bacterial growth, Rosenberg noticed that bacteria near platinum electrodes stopped dividing. This observation had nothing to do with cancer initially, but it ultimately led to the development of cisplatin, one of the most effective chemotherapy drugs ever created 7 .
Cisplatin transformed testicular cancer from a disease with a 90% death rate into one with a 95% survival rate, saving countless lives including Olympic skater Scott Hamilton 7 .
For decades, scientists believed they understood how cisplatin worked: it damages cancer cell DNA, preventing replication and triggering cell death. However, recent research has revealed a surprising second mechanism that makes this drug even more fascinating—it literally starves cancer cells by cutting off their energy supply 1 6 .
Traditional understanding: cisplatin binds to DNA, causing crosslinks that prevent replication and transcription.
New discovery: cisplatin inhibits integrin β5-mediated glycolysis, starving cancer cells of energy.
To understand cisplatin's newly discovered mechanism, we first need to discuss cancer's unusual eating habits. Unlike healthy cells that efficiently convert glucose into energy using oxygen, cancer cells behave differently. Even when oxygen is plentiful, they prefer to gorge on glucose and ferment it through a process called glycolysis, producing lactate as a byproduct. This phenomenon, known as the Warburg effect, seems counterintuitive at first glance.
Why would cancer cells choose this inefficient metabolic pathway? The answer lies in their need for speed and building materials. Glycolysis provides:
Quick ATP production for immediate energy needs of rapidly dividing cells.
Intermediate metabolites serve as precursors for nucleotides, amino acids, and lipids.
Ability to thrive in varying tumor environments with fluctuating oxygen levels.
This metabolic reprogramming gives cancer cells a growth advantage, but it also creates a potential Achilles' heel—their dependence on glycolysis for survival and proliferation. Researchers have long wondered whether targeting this metabolic addiction could be the key to more effective cancer therapies.
Enter integrin β5 (ITGB5), a protein that sits on the surface of cells and acts as a communication hub between the cell and its environment. Integrins are like cellular antennae, detecting signals from the surrounding tissue and relaying them inside the cell to dictate behavior.
ITGB5 activates focal adhesion kinase (FAK), which increases production of glucose transporters (GLUT1, GLUT4) and lactate dehydrogenase B (LDHB), driving glycolytic flux in cancer cells.
While integrins have traditionally been studied for their role in cell adhesion and migration, recent research has revealed that ITGB5 plays a special role in cancer metabolism, particularly in aggressive forms like triple-negative breast cancer and cervical cancer 4 . Think of ITGB5 as a metabolic switch that, when flipped on, turbocharges the cancer cell's glucose consumption.
ITGB5 doesn't work alone—it activates a downstream signaling pathway involving focal adhesion kinase (FAK), which in turn increases the production of proteins responsible for importing and processing glucose 1 . This creates a perfect environment for cancer growth:
In many cancers, especially aggressive forms, ITGB5 becomes overactive, essentially keeping the metabolic switch permanently flipped on and driving uncontrolled growth.
When researchers noticed that cancer cells consumed less energy after cisplatin treatment, they designed a series of elegant experiments to understand why. The central question was simple yet profound: Could cisplatin's effectiveness be due not only to DNA damage but also to metabolic disruption?
The research team, whose work was published in the American Journal of Cancer Research, designed a comprehensive study to unravel this mystery 1 6 :
They chose human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) and cervical cancer (Siha) cell lines, known for their aggressive growth and relevance to human cancers.
Cells were exposed to specific concentrations of cisplatin (20 μM for MDA-MB-231 and 3 μM for Siha) for 48 hours to observe the effects.
Using specialized kits, the researchers directly measured glucose uptake and lactate production—the two hallmarks of glycolytic activity.
They examined changes in key proteins including ITGB5, FAK, phosphorylated FAK (p-FAK), and glycolysis-related proteins (GLUT1, GLUT4, LDHB) using Western blot analysis.
To prove ITGB5's specific role, they both suppressed it using siRNA and overexpressed it using lentiviral vectors.
They evaluated cancer cell proliferation using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) and colony formation ability through soft-agar assays.
The findings were validated in live mice by injecting cancer cells with normal and modified ITGB5 levels and monitoring tumor growth with and without cisplatin treatment.
The experiments yielded clear and compelling evidence that cisplatin directly targets cancer metabolism through the ITGB5/FAK pathway.
| Cell Line | Glucose Uptake Reduction | Lactate Production Reduction | GLUT1/GLUT4 Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| MDA-MB-231 (Breast Cancer) | ~40% | ~35% | Significant Decrease |
| Siha (Cervical Cancer) | ~45% | ~40% | Significant Decrease |
When researchers measured glycolysis after cisplatin treatment, they found dramatic reductions in both glucose consumption and lactate production across both cancer types. This indicated that cisplatin was directly interfering with the cancer cells' ability to process glucose 1 6 .
At the molecular level, the changes were equally striking. Cisplatin treatment caused:
The most compelling evidence came from the genetic manipulation experiments. When researchers artificially increased ITGB5 levels in cancer cells, something remarkable happened—the cells became resistant to cisplatin's effects. The ITGB5-overexpressing cells maintained their glycolytic activity and continued proliferating despite cisplatin treatment 1 .
| Parameter | Cisplatin Alone | Cisplatin + ITGB5 Overexpression |
|---|---|---|
| Glycolysis Activity | Strongly Inhibited | Restored to Near-Normal Levels |
| Cell Proliferation | Significantly Suppressed | Largely Maintained |
| Colony Formation | Drastically Reduced | Partially Rescued |
The animal studies confirmed these findings in living systems. Tumors with normal ITGB5 levels shrank significantly with cisplatin treatment, while those with artificially high ITGB5 continued growing, demonstrating that ITGB5 levels directly influence cisplatin sensitivity 1 .
DNA damage through crosslinking, preventing replication and transcription
Metabolic disruption through ITGB5/FAK pathway inhibition, starving cancer cells
These tools allowed researchers to systematically dissect the relationship between cisplatin, ITGB5, and cancer metabolism, providing multiple lines of evidence to support their conclusions.
| Reagent/Method | Function in Research | Application in This Study |
|---|---|---|
| CCK-8 Assay | Measures cell proliferation and viability | Quantified cancer cell growth inhibition by cisplatin |
| Western Blot Analysis | Detects specific proteins in complex mixtures | Measured ITGB5, FAK, GLUT1, GLUT4, and LDHB levels |
| siRNA Technology | Selectively silences specific genes | Confirmed ITGB5 role by knocking it down |
| Lentiviral Vectors | Delivers genetic material into cells | Overexpressed ITGB5 to test cisplatin resistance |
| Glucose Uptake Assay Kit | Directly measures cellular glucose consumption | Quantified glycolysis changes after cisplatin treatment |
| Lactate Assay Kit | Measures lactate production in cells | Confirmed glycolytic flux alterations |
| Soft-Agar Colony Formation | Assesses anchorage-independent growth (tumorigenic potential) | Evaluated cancer cell aggressiveness after treatments |
The discovery of cisplatin's metabolic effects through ITGB5 inhibition opens exciting new possibilities for cancer treatment. Rather than relying solely on traditional chemotherapy, researchers can now explore combination therapies that simultaneously target DNA and cancer metabolism.
Since ITGB5 overexpression can make cells resistant to cisplatin, measuring ITGB5 levels in tumors could help identify which patients will respond best to cisplatin therapy 1 . This moves us closer to personalized cancer treatment based on individual tumor characteristics.
Developing drugs that specifically inhibit ITGB5 could enhance cisplatin's effectiveness or overcome resistance.
Combining cisplatin with other glycolysis inhibitors could create a powerful synergy against aggressive cancers.
Monitoring ITGB5 levels could help track treatment response and detect emerging resistance earlier.
The revelation of cisplatin's dual mechanisms—damaging DNA while simultaneously starving cancer cells of energy—represents a major advancement in our understanding of cancer biology. It demonstrates that sometimes, the most effective solutions come from addressing multiple vulnerabilities at once.
Conclusion: As research continues, the accidental discovery that started with bacteria and platinum electrodes continues to reveal new secrets, reminding us that fundamental scientific curiosity often leads to the most profound medical breakthroughs. Cisplatin's story, spanning over half a century, continues to evolve, offering new hope for more effective cancer therapies that target the very engines that drive cancer growth.
For further reading on this topic, the original research study can be found in the American Journal of Cancer Research (2016), and background on cisplatin's discovery is available through Michigan State University archives 1 7 .